{"id":4338,"date":"2025-06-13T10:58:32","date_gmt":"2025-06-13T10:58:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pragal-prinzenberg.de\/?p=4338"},"modified":"2025-10-28T12:46:42","modified_gmt":"2025-10-28T12:46:42","slug":"hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/","title":{"rendered":"Hamburg Regional Court criticizes \u201cwidespread misunderstanding\u201d of the public prosecutor&#8217;s office in Inspection proceedings (\u00a7 110 StPO)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Unlawfulness of the search and the visual inspection procedure pursuant to \u00a7 110 StPO<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group has-base-background-color has-background\"><div class=\"wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>During searches, investigative authorities are allowed to\u00a0<strong>take data carriers and documents<\/strong>\u00a0to assess their relevance as evidence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>This review must be\u00a0<strong>limited to evaluating evidentiary relevance<\/strong>; in-depth analysis is not permitted. A review lasting\u00a0<strong>several years<\/strong>, even in complex cases, is\u00a0<strong>disproportionate and therefore unlawful<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>After completing this review, authorities must\u00a0<strong>formally request the seizure<\/strong>\u00a0of documents deemed relevant as evidence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>In practice, however, prosecutors often\u00a0<strong>fail to request formal seizure<\/strong>\u00a0and already conduct extensive analysis during the initial review. This behavior is\u00a0<strong>unlawful<\/strong>, though the\u00a0<strong>Hamburg Regional Court<\/strong>\u00a0rejected claims of intentional misconduct due to a\u00a0<strong>\u201cwidespread misunderstanding.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In extensive and complex investigation proceedings against a client from the healthcare sector, the Hamburg Regional Court clarified the limits of the visual inspection procedure pursuant <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gesetze-im-internet.de\/stpo\/__110.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">to \u00a7 110 of the German Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO)<\/a> and thus strengthened the procedural rights of those affected (decision of 5.6.2025 &#8211; Ref.: 616 Qs 14\/25)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The facts of the case:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">During a search in 2019, the investigating authorities had provisionally seized numerous documents pursuant to Section 110 StPO. This standard allows documents to be inspected to determine their relevance as evidence, but not to be analyzed in depth without a court order. Depending on the result of the inspection, either a seizure order must be applied for or the items must be returned. However, the documents taken <strong>were extensively analyzed by the LKA Hamburg (State Criminal Police Office Hamburg) for over 4 \u00bd years (!)<\/strong>. A motion for formal seizure was only submitted in 2024 <a href=\"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/decision-hamburg-local-court-violation-inspection-proceedings\/\">following the objection to this procedural violation<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The main points of the decision:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A <strong>substantive evaluation of the material&#8217;s content<\/strong> as part of the screening process is inadmissible.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The inspection period of more than 4 \u00bd years is <strong>disproportionate<\/strong>, even in complex and extensive proceedings.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Sifting continues until return or formal confiscation takes place. The mere notification to the person concerned and\/or their legal counsel that the inspection has been completed cannot replace a <strong>formal decision<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Despite these multiple violations of the law, the Regional Court did not assume any intentional or arbitrary conduct on the part of the public prosecutor&#8217;s office.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Conclusion:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision confirms what is already recognized in case law and literature &#8211; and yet repeatedly gets out of hand in practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is worthy of criticism that the regional court (presumably to avoid prohibitions on the use of evidence) did not attest to any intentional or arbitrary conduct on the part of the public prosecutor&#8217;s office, but instead referred to a \u201cwidespread misunderstanding\u201d within the investigating authorities &#8211; as if this made things better. In fact, the old principle of \u201cIura novit curia\u201d (\u201cThe court knows the law\u201d) also applies to public prosecutors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, the clear decision should contribute to further awareness-raising. If the widespread, unlawful practice is nevertheless upheld in the present proceedings, it is likely that in future there will be a deliberate (and therefore arbitrary) disregard of the judge&#8217;s reservation of jurisdiction with the possible consequence of a <strong>ban on the use of evidence<\/strong>. It therefore remains essential for the <a href=\"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/competencies\/criminal-defence\/\">defence <\/a>to always keep an eye on compliance with procedural requirements and to consistently complain about procedural errors.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Unlawfulness of the search and the visual inspection procedure pursuant to \u00a7 110 StPO Key Takeaways In extensive and complex investigation proceedings against a client from the healthcare sector, the Hamburg Regional Court clarified the limits of the visual inspection procedure pursuant to \u00a7 110 of the German Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO) and thus &#8230; <a title=\"Hamburg Regional Court criticizes \u201cwidespread misunderstanding\u201d of the public prosecutor&#8217;s office in Inspection proceedings (\u00a7 110 StPO)\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Hamburg Regional Court criticizes \u201cwidespread misunderstanding\u201d of the public prosecutor&#8217;s office in Inspection proceedings (\u00a7 110 StPO)\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":4344,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-criminal-defence"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Hamburg Court: Section 110 StPO inspection often misunderstood<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Court criticizes unlawful inspection under \u00a7 110 StPO. Decision strengthens rights of affected individuals &amp; emphasizes judicial reservation\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hamburg Court: Section 110 StPO inspection often misunderstood\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Court criticizes unlawful inspection under \u00a7 110 StPO. Decision strengthens rights of affected individuals &amp; emphasizes judicial reservation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Pragal Rechtsanw\u00e4lte\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-13T10:58:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-28T12:46:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/sichtungsverfahren-110.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1536\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Queenie\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Queenie\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hamburg Court: Section 110 StPO inspection often misunderstood","description":"Court criticizes unlawful inspection under \u00a7 110 StPO. Decision strengthens rights of affected individuals & emphasizes judicial reservation","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hamburg Court: Section 110 StPO inspection often misunderstood","og_description":"Court criticizes unlawful inspection under \u00a7 110 StPO. Decision strengthens rights of affected individuals & emphasizes judicial reservation","og_url":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/","og_site_name":"Pragal Rechtsanw\u00e4lte","article_published_time":"2025-06-13T10:58:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-28T12:46:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1536,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/sichtungsverfahren-110.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Queenie","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Queenie","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/"},"author":{"name":"Queenie","@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/50fb3e0e6fefa40b9ea22dfc7aad147a"},"headline":"Hamburg Regional Court criticizes \u201cwidespread misunderstanding\u201d of the public prosecutor&#8217;s office in Inspection proceedings (\u00a7 110 StPO)","datePublished":"2025-06-13T10:58:32+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-28T12:46:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/"},"wordCount":551,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/sichtungsverfahren-110.jpg","articleSection":["Criminal Defence"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/","url":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/","name":"Hamburg Court: Section 110 StPO inspection often misunderstood","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/sichtungsverfahren-110.jpg","datePublished":"2025-06-13T10:58:32+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-28T12:46:42+00:00","description":"Court criticizes unlawful inspection under \u00a7 110 StPO. Decision strengthens rights of affected individuals & emphasizes judicial reservation","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/sichtungsverfahren-110.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/sichtungsverfahren-110.jpg","width":1536,"height":1024,"caption":"Beschlagnahmung von Dokumenten nach Praxis-Durchsuchung"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/blog\/hamburg-court-criticizes-misunderstanding-110-stpo\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hamburg Regional Court criticizes \u201cwidespread misunderstanding\u201d of the public prosecutor&#8217;s office in Inspection proceedings (\u00a7 110 StPO)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/","name":"Pragal Rechtsanw\u00e4lte","description":"Renommierte Hamburger Kanzlei spezialisiert auf Wirtschaftsstrafrecht &amp; Wirtschaftsrecht","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Renommierte Hamburger Kanzlei spezialisiert auf Wirtschaftsstrafrecht & Compliance","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/#organization","name":"Pragal Rechtsanw\u00e4lte","url":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/logo-pragal-ra-quad.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/logo-pragal-ra-quad.png","width":696,"height":696,"caption":"Pragal Rechtsanw\u00e4lte"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/50fb3e0e6fefa40b9ea22dfc7aad147a","name":"Queenie","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/46462ea8a8bdc80e1aeddf3f9643d5a0f5ee737b49c48e4c755ab4ed81cbba0b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/46462ea8a8bdc80e1aeddf3f9643d5a0f5ee737b49c48e4c755ab4ed81cbba0b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/46462ea8a8bdc80e1aeddf3f9643d5a0f5ee737b49c48e4c755ab4ed81cbba0b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Queenie"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4338"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4338\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5117,"href":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4338\/revisions\/5117"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4344"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pragal-rechtsanwaelte.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}